jump to navigation

Cities Have Their Priorities July 20, 2007

Posted by Webmaster in Infrastructure.
trackback

Time Magazine:

A burst pipe in midtown Manhattan on Wednesday stirred the anxieties of New Yorkers who have experienced plenty of them since 9/11. But given the decrepit state of the country’s urban infrastructure, the debacle could very well have been at a bridge in Boston or a sewer in Philadelphia. Indeed, the Manhattan steam-pipe geyser might be compared to the flooding of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina and the 2003 blackout of the Eastern Seaboard: accidents and catastrophes that might have been prevented with the right funding and political priorities.

Urban planning experts say America’s older cities are modern-day Pompeiis - within range of volcanoes of infrastructure failures like New York’s. On Wednesday, a pipe, laid in 1924, exploded near Grand Central station, killing one person and injuring 30. Maintaining a sewer system is hardly a sexy political issue, but years of funding neglect and a subsequent lack of maintenance nationwide have left many of the country’s engineering systems unprepared to handle future stresses. “We have an aging infrastructure in this country, and we are not doing enough to maintain it and replace it,” said Sarah Catz, director of the Center for Urban Infrastructure at University of California-Irvine. “What you saw happen in New York will happen in all types of infrastructures.”

In Jared Taylor’s 1992 book, Paved with Good Intentions, there are a few paragraphs about New York City’s infrastructure. It is literally falling apart in many places, because the city’s government has to divert money from it to pay for crime suppression measures and social welfare. And so it is with many major cities in America.

Comments

Sorry comments are closed for this entry